|
|||||||
Perverse sense of entitlement |
|||||||
Ottawa, Ontario - September 9, 2002, by: Peter MacKay | |||||||
regrettable |
And he is right. |
||||||
|
|||||||
sullies the |
Clifford Olsen, Paul Bernardo and other criminals should not have the right to vote in a federal election. It sullies the process and detracts from the rights of all Canadians. Taking away their right to vote is a reasonable limit to the rights of a person found guilty of breaking the law. The minority opinion, rendered by Justice Gonthier, that prisoners are already being denied the fundamental right of mobility is correct. Prisoners are not physically able to go out and vote because they have committed a serious crime and losing the right to vote is merely an extension of that limitation and should be considered a reasonable limit under the Charter's guarantees. |
||||||
|
Paul Bernardo |
||||||
|
|||||||
dangerous |
But more than the constitutional right of prisoners to vote is at issue here. This is about the ability of Parliament to govern effectively through reasonable legislation without the Court's interference. The 5-4 decision brings into question Parliament's legitimacy in determining what is or is not a justifiable punishment and it sets a very dangerous precedent. I am urging the Minister of Justice to carefully review this decision and act accordingly knowing the vast majority of Canadians are in disagreement with the direction the Court has taken us. |
||||||
|
Justice Gonthier |
||||||
M.P. Pictou-Antigonish-Guysborough |
|||||||
References: | |||||||
Cohen, Gail J. Taking on the tough cases, November, 2002, Law Times Online | |||||||
Biography of Peter MacKay | |||||||
Supreme Court judgement that prompted these concerns | |||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||