Canada's Privacy Commissioner George Radwanski |
|||||||
Canada, wake up Ö your freedom, liberty and privacy are vanishing |
|||||||
Ottawa - Sunday, February 2, 2003 - by: Walter Robinson, Federal Director, Canadian Taxpayers Federation | |||||||
under |
January 2003 may very well go down in Canadian history as the beginning of the end of democracy as we know it. Canadians better wake up from their collectivist, groupthink, government-coddled slumber before itís too late and state-sanctioned thinking takes hold. Political finance rip-offs, election gag laws and an Orwell-esque report from the privacy commissioner show that our freedoms of expression, democratic participation and privacy are under attack at every turn courtesy of the federal government. | ||||||
|
|||||||
transparency |
While supporters of this weekís election finance reform package ñ ending big ticket corporate and union donations ñ portray it as step towards transparency, it should be called for what it really is, a broad daylight mugging of Canadian taxpayers. | ||||||
|
|||||||
jump from |
Taxpayers already subsidize parties and candidates through tax credits and election expense rebates. The plan unveiled by Mr. Chretien this week makes this abhorrent situation worse. Indeed, taxpayer fattening of the bank accounts of the five major parties and others including the Communists and Yogic fliers will jump from 59% to almost 90%. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
"fleece the |
Under the Chretien ìfleece the little guyî scheme, political parties will net $35 million in non-election years and up to $80 million in an election year based on the number of votes cast for each party. Talk about entrenching power and a significant funding advantage for the party in power (who just happen to be the Liberals), yikes. | ||||||
|
|||||||
big-money |
If Chretien and crew were really serious about ending the so-called big-money influence in politics, they should have ended tax credits for political contributions and campaign expense rebates, period. But instead the government proposes to double the maximum amount eligible for a 75% tax credit from $200 to $400. Meanwhile, a similar donation to the local United Way or cancer centre merits a paltry 16% tax credit. And the government has the nerve to call this fair and transparent? | ||||||
|
|||||||
sinful |
American founding father Thomas Jefferson was right in 1779 when he stated: ìTo compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical.î Sinful indeed Ö so much for political freedom. | ||||||
|
|||||||
deny your |
And speaking of elections, itís bad enough that the feds want us to pay for 90% of their political campaign, costs, but at the same time, theyíre looking to deny your right to say anything during these same election campaigns. | ||||||
|
|||||||
gag-law |
Earlier this month government House Leader Don Boudria confirmed that Ottawa will indeed press ahead and appeal a federal court ruling which deemed that Ottawaís election gag-law effectively banning advertising by citizen groups during election campaigns was unconstitutional. | ||||||
|
|||||||
constitutional |
Even though the courts have struck down Ottawaís gag laws repeatedly in the last two decades, our federal government will once again squander untold millions to try and trample on our constitutional freedom of expression. At the root of this law is the assumption that voters are stupid (wrong!) and easily swayed by advertising which begs the question: Why is political party advertising OK but not advertising from anyone else? So much for liberty. | ||||||
|
|||||||
privacy |
Finally, the recent annual report from privacy commissioner George Radwanski has sounded more troubling bells than a New York City five-alarm fire. His 74-page tome is more chilling than Orwellís 1984. From Canada Customís eternal passenger database to a national ID card to the RCMPís intrusive and expanding video surveillance, our privacy is rapidly disappearing. As conservative philosopher Edmund Burke so pointedly warned us: ìthe true danger is when liberty is nibbled away, for expedience, and by parts.î Wake up Canada, our peace, order and good government are at stake! | ||||||
Walter Robinson Federal Director |
|||||||
References: | |||||||
Privacy Commissioner of Canada 2001 - 2002 Annual report | |||||||
Privacy commissioner says anti-terrorism bill opens way to police state, November 1, 2002, Guelph Mercury | |||||||
Thorne, Stephen, Privacy commissioner George Radwanski has 'grave concerns' about sections of the anti-terrorism bill. November 2, 2002, Halifax Herald Limited. | |||||||
|