|  | 
	
		|  | Batoch Church by Gerald Crawford
		 | 
	
		| Readjustment of the legal framework
		 | 
	
		|  |  | 
	
		| Niagara Falls, Ontario - Wednesday, June 17, 2003 -
			by: Joe Hueglin | 
	
		|  |  | 
	
		|  
		 | What follows relates to a readjustment of the legal framework
			governing domestic relationships. It is sent to you to add to the mix of thoughts
			already in your mind. Seldom is anything new but at times actions that offer positive
			alternatives to issues come to mind. | 
	
		|  | 
 			 | 
	
		|  | The purpose of this post is to offer for your consideration
			an alternative direction on one of the more contentious issues facing our society
			at this moment in time. | 
	
		|  | 
 			 | 
	
		|  | 
				Committed lifetime monogamous heterosexual relationships through
				wedlock, once the only socially accepted norm, have had added to them serial monogamy,
				relationships outside of wedlock and homosexual relationships. .
 
There are types of committed relationships other than sexual.
 
The extension, the equalization, of economic and other benefits
				now restricted to heterosexual unions to other types of committed relationships is
				not contingent upon application of the term marriage.
 
The division of assets upon the dissolution of relationships have
				created a situation where a contract going in is a increasingly necessary reality.
 
The congruence once existing between institutions of the state
				and the precepts of established religions no longer attain in a number of fields
				and need not exist for there to be legal relationships established between/among
				those committing to them.
 
The state can establish legal frameworks in which those choosing
				to enter into commitments can do so. It can as well establish the means through which
				these relationships can be mutually or unilaterally dissolved.
 
The term to be applied to such a relationship must of necessity
				be broad enough to encompass both sexual and non-sexual relationships. Both Registered
				Civil Union and Registered Domestic Partnership are but examples of suitable
				inclusive descriptive terms.
 
The term marriage is not a suitable term in that it is
				a sexually based term inextricably linked in Canadian society to religion.
 
Entering into wedlock, the joining of a bride and groom and the
				societal usages associated with them are essentially religious rather than legally
				based.
			 | 
	
		|  |  | 
	
		|  
		 | The argument presented here is that there be a clear
			cut division between the contractual arrangement being entered into through registration
			with the state of the mutual obligations being entered into...and...that which is
			essentially a religious act, that of entering into wedlock. | 
	
		|  |  | 
	
		|  
		 | Marriage, a term which flows out of wedlock, ceasing
			to have legal implications becomes not denotative in meaning but connotative and
			as such open to differing usages among those employing it. | 
	
		|  
		 | 
 			 | 
	
		|  
		 | Such action on the part of the Government would provide
			equitable treatment to all entering into domestic partnerships under the law and
			leave the meaning of the word marriage, the basis of contention, to be determined
			by societal usage and not by statute. | 
	
		|  |  | 
	
		|  
		 | Joe Hueglin
		 | 
	
		|  |  | 
	
		| 
 | 
	
		|  |  | 
	
		| 
			 
				
					|  
					 |  
					| Retrun to Ensign
						- Return to Saskatchewan
						News
					 |  
					|  |  
					| This page is a story posted on Ensign and/or Saskatchewan
						News, both of which are daily web sites offering a variety of material from scenic
						images, political commentary, information and news. These publications are the work
						of Faster Than Light Communications . If you would like to comment on this story or you wish to contact
						the editor of these sites please send us email. |  
					|  |  
					| Editor : Timothy W. ShireFaster Than Light Communication
 Box 1776, Tisdale, Saskatchewan, Canada, S0E 1T0
 306 873 2004
 |  |