A permanent target for the Air Farce chicken cannon

A permanent target for the
Air Farce chicken cannon

Cobble Hill, B.C. - Thursday, January 15, 2004 By: Bruce Federick

People never cease to amaze. I suppose when you start a con as blatant as the one that MacKay is guilty of, there is no incentive to change your evil ways. I listened to Peter MacKay on Politics this afternoon with Don Newman and found myself incredulous when MacKay said that he was going to stay around the new party as its conscience.

Squaring that with his earlier statement that not running was the hardest decision of his life, thereby stating that knifing a man in the back, lying, breaking his promise, tearing up a contract, cheating a large number of his caucus, etc was relatively easy.

Does this suggest that he is a pathological liar and perhaps a menace to society?

Is there any chance that the people of the new riding of Central Nova would elect him on merit.? Would it be strategic to work to elect him to parliament again in order to be certain that the face of the liar is around to remind Canadians, until at least the 2007 election of what he did and why they need to be careful of their vote.

Perhaps he'll be useful as a pin up as the most 'eligible' bachelor in the House of Commons once again and a great cad for the ladies and all others to throw darts at. Perhaps he could even become a permanent target for the Air Farce chicken cannon.

Bruce Frederick


A permanent target for the Air Farce chicken cannon

Cobble Hill, B.C. - Thursday, January 15, 2004 By: Bruce Federick

	People never cease to amaze. I suppose when you start a con as blatant as the one that MacKay is guilty of, there is no incentive to change your evil ways. I listened to Peter MacKay on Politics this afternoon with Don Newman and found myself incredulous when MacKay said that he was going to stay around the new party as its conscience.

	Squaring that with his earlier statement that not running was the hardest decision of his life, thereby stating that knifing a man in the back, lying, breaking his promise, tearing up a contract, cheating a large number of his caucus, etc was relatively easy.

	Does this suggest that he is a pathological liar and perhaps a menace to society?

	Is there any chance that the people of the new riding of Central Nova would elect him on merit.? Would it be strategic to work to elect him to parliament again in order to be certain that the face of the liar is around to remind Canadians, until at least the 2007 election of what he did and why they need to be careful of their vote.

	Perhaps he'll be useful as a pin up as the most 'eligible' bachelor in the House of Commons once again and a great cad for the ladies and all others to throw darts at. Perhaps he could even become a permanent target for the Air Farce chicken cannon.

	Bruce Frederick