Global Markets, the Cycle of Poverty and Deregulations: Brainwashing Canadians with the neoclassical dogma of the 'invisible hand'

Nipawin - Saturday, August 18, 2001 - by: Mario deSantis

stupid
mistake

"economic rationalists want you to believe that self-interest makes private employees faultlessly efficient and public employees reliably inefficient. It's a stupid mistake" -- Hugh Stretton

free
market
forces

big lie

We just mentioned a world wide movement to debunk the science of neoclassical economics. This neoclassical science is based on the concept that the 'invisible hand' as expressed by free market forces is the organizing principle of the economy. The invisible hand is mentioned only once in Adam Smith's 'The Wealth of a Nations' yet our neoclassical economists have been heralding the invisible hand as the principle of a free economic system.

We have intelligence and we have emotions and we can be creative, yet our economic gurus are telling us that the 'invisible hand' or the law of demand and supply will secure the optimal allocation of resources. This is the big lie of neoclassical economics, the lie that the invisible hand will secure the optimal allocation of resources.

mergers

As a simple man as I am, I tell you my readers, that there is no invisible hand securing the optimal allocation of resources. Best Buy has just announced the purchase of Future Shop, and I ask if this purchase was the exercise of the invisible hand or the exercise to further control the market of digital technology products and appliances. We have been witnessing the biggest ever mergers of businesses and I ask if these mergers were managed by the invisible hand.

Fred
McMahon
We have a brainwashing campaign financed by the big corporations all around the world trying to inculcate the dogmas of neoclassical economics into the people's minds. Here, in Saskatchewan, this brainwashing campaign is carried forward by the globally owned "The StarPhoenix" in its intermittent series of columns reporting excerpts of the forthcoming book 'Memos to the Prime Minister: What Canada Should Be in the 21st Century.' In one of these newspaper's columns, economist Fred McMahon of the Fraser Institute has stated that "the cycle of poverty is perpetuated through voluntary choice" and I ask if the invisible hand is responsible for the cycle of poverty.

oligopoly
We have no invisible hand and we have no free market forces as our global economic system has become an oligopoly dominated by few transnational corporations. We don't have the invisible hand as a guiding principle of our economy, but we have the visible predators' hands of our politicians and corporate friends.

dogma
We don't have the invisible hand, but we still have the civic relationship of our people, people with values, people with education, people with creativity and emotion, people with Social Capital. In the name of the neoclassical dogma 'invisible hand' these same people are voluntarily ignored by governments and their corporate friends.

deregulation
Timothy Shire, publisher of Ensign, sent me a copy of the article "B.C. government fires first shots in war on red tape." In this article, I find that the highest priority of the B.C. government is to kill two old regulations for every new one approved. I have no special concern in the governmental effort to reduce the number of regulations, but when I realize that this government has the special ministry of state for deregulation, then something is very wrong. This B.C. government is putting deregulations at the top of its agenda and is forgetting its people.

research
is
biased
We just ridiculed the Fraser Institute's research contending to increase productivity by reducing the number of regulations, and now we have the B.C. government acting dogmatically on this biased research. I say that the Fraser Institute's research is biased because its recommendation to reduce the number of governmental regulations come straight from the dogma of neoclassical economics to reduce governments and their regulations.

just and equitable
For the record, Adam Smith was tolerant of regulations especially for the purpose of reducing poverty and said that

"when the regulation, therefore, is in support of the workman, it is always just and equitable; but it is sometimes otherwise when in favour of the masters"

alienated
It is a fact that our governments and corporations are alienated from people; it is time to debunk the dogma of the invisible hand of neoclassical economics, and it is time to restore and nurture our Social
Capital, the capital emerging from our own civic intelligence.

------------------References

Related social and economic articles published by Ensign

The Australian, Ramona Koval's Focus column, commenting on the new book "Economics: A new Introduction" by professor Hugh Stretton, 6th January 2001 http://www.btinternet.com/~pae_news/Koval.htm

Global Economic News Post-Autistic Economics Network http://www.btinternet.com/~pae_news/GEN.htm

Rediscovering 'The Wealth of Nations', by Alan B. Krueger, ECONOMIC SCENE, The New York Times, August 16, 2001

B.C. government fires first shots in war on red tape, Jim Beatty and Jeremy Sandler, Vancouver Sun, August 16, 2001 http://www.vancouversun.com/newsite/news/649415.html


Nipawin - Saturday, August 18, 2001 - by: Mario deSantis

stupid mistake	"economic rationalists want you to believe that self-interest makes private employees faultlessly efficient and public employees reliably inefficient. It's a stupid mistake" -- Hugh Stretton

free market forces big lie	We just mentioned a world wide movement to debunk the science of neoclassical economics. This neoclassical science is based on the concept that the 'invisible hand' as expressed by free market forces is the organizing principle of the economy. The invisible hand is mentioned only once in Adam Smith's 'The Wealth of a Nations' yet our neoclassical economists have been heralding the invisible hand as the principle of a free economic system. We have intelligence and we have emotions and we can be creative, yet our economic gurus are telling us that the 'invisible hand' or the law of demand and supply will secure the optimal allocation of resources. This is the big lie of neoclassical economics, the lie that the invisible hand will secure the optimal allocation of resources.

mergers	As a simple man as I am, I tell you my readers, that there is no invisible hand securing the optimal allocation of resources. *Best Buy* has just announced the purchase of *Future Shop*, and I ask if this purchase was the exercise of the invisible hand or the exercise to further control the market of digital technology products and appliances. We have been witnessing the biggest ever mergers of businesses and I ask if these mergers were managed by the invisible hand.

Fred McMahon	We have a brainwashing campaign financed by the big corporations all around the world trying to inculcate the dogmas of neoclassical economics into the people's minds. Here, in Saskatchewan, this brainwashing campaign is carried forward by the globally owned "*The StarPhoenix" in its intermittent series of columns reporting excerpts of the forthcoming book 'Memos to the Prime Minister: What Canada Should Be in the 21st Century.' In one of these newspaper's columns, economist Fred McMahon of the Fraser Institute has stated that "the cycle of poverty is perpetuated through voluntary choice*" and I ask if the invisible hand is responsible for the cycle of poverty.

oligopoly	We have no invisible hand and we have no free market forces as our global economic system has become an oligopoly dominated by few transnational corporations. We don't have the invisible hand as a guiding principle of our economy, but we have the visible predators' hands of our politicians and corporate friends.

dogma	We don't have the invisible hand, but we still have the civic relationship of our people, people with values, people with education, people with creativity and emotion, people with Social Capital. In the name of the neoclassical dogma 'invisible hand' these same people are voluntarily ignored by governments and their corporate friends.

deregulation	Timothy Shire, publisher of Ensign, sent me a copy of the article "B.C. government fires first shots in war on red tape." In this article, I find that the highest priority of the B.C. government is to kill two old regulations for every new one approved. I have no special concern in the governmental effort to reduce the number of regulations, but when I realize that this government has the special ministry of state for deregulation, then something is very wrong. This B.C. government is putting deregulations at the top of its agenda and is forgetting its people.

research is biased	We just ridiculed the Fraser Institute's research contending to increase productivity by reducing the number of regulations, and now we have the B.C. government acting dogmatically on this biased research. I say that the Fraser Institute's research is biased because its recommendation to reduce the number of governmental regulations come straight from the dogma of neoclassical economics to reduce governments and their regulations.

just and equitable	For the record, Adam Smith was tolerant of regulations especially for the purpose of reducing poverty and said that
just and equitable	"when the regulation, therefore, is in support of the workman, it is always just and equitable; but it is sometimes otherwise when in favour of the masters"

alienated	It is a fact that our governments and corporations are alienated from people; it is time to debunk the dogma of the invisible hand of neoclassical economics, and it is time to restore and nurture our Social Capital, the capital emerging from our own civic intelligence.

------------------References
	Related social and economic articles published by *Ensign*

	The Australian, Ramona Koval's Focus column, commenting on the new book "Economics: A new Introduction" by professor Hugh Stretton, 6th January 2001 http://www.btinternet.com/~pae_news/Koval.htm

	Global Economic News Post-Autistic Economics Network http://www.btinternet.com/~pae_news/GEN.htm

	Rediscovering 'The Wealth of Nations', by Alan B. Krueger, ECONOMIC SCENE, The New York Times, August 16, 2001

	B.C. government fires first shots in war on red tape, Jim Beatty and Jeremy Sandler, Vancouver Sun, August 16, 2001 http://www.vancouversun.com/newsite/news/649415.html